Should Medical Associations Preach Evidence Basis?

Evidence basis gets much attention. Unfortunately there is much opinion and assumption that buries the evidence. The pathway to becoming a leader in an association is paved with areas believed to be important with or without evidence basis. Associations are prone to point out the need for evidence basis, but they may be the ones that should be improving evidence basis across leaders, staff, and media.

The popular media passed around is a great source for assumptions. Unfortunately works published in major journals need a great deal of improvement also.


AAFP has a number of areas for improvement regarding evidence basis

1. Maintenance of Certification is supported despite lack of evidence
2. Pay for Performance and derivatives are supported despite lack of outcome improvement in major reviews
3. Pay for Performance is supported despite the consistent evidence to lesser payment for those serving Americans left behind (where family physicians are 3 times more likely to be found)
4. AAFP should be exposing the lack of significant health outcomes improvements from a number of clinical interventions
5. AAFP should maintain a constant focus on the personal, community, social factors that are 60 - 70% of health outcomes. This also leads to a choice between outcomes improvements for most Americans or protection of the academic/clinical focus/status quo.

The above should be reflected in all media, leadership postings, and staff activities. Pay for Performance fails in evidence based reviews

Opposing the Tyranny of Health Care Research

In addition AAFP should prioritize a return to evidence basis. There should be movement away from jump on the bandwagon acceptance of research methods and findings that were exposed as defective 100 years ago. Dr. Jha noted below has been consistent in such work.

"What is the central tendency of a distribution but a lazy generalization? The aggregate, the mean, is wrong about everyone but the few closest to the mean, yet is so revered because we mistake the aggregate for the truth. The tyranny of the aggregate is the most extraordinary tyranny of our times. The aggregate is built by people who vary, yet it imposes itself on the individuals, the very variation which creates it. It literally bites the hands that feed it." SAURABH JHA, MD (associate editor with The Health Care Blog)

More at The Tyranny of Health Care Research

Please No More So-Called Primary Care Solutions

As a consideration AAFP should also be critical regarding promotions of various training interventions. There has been some tacit understanding of "The Dean's Lie" regarding medical school leader claims of primary care result that are not really primary care, but AAFP has not remained critical in an evidence-based way.


There have long been claims of overall improvements across MD DO NP PA FM training in areas such as primary care, health access, rural practice, or care where needed. But all fail due to inadequate financial design.

Training interventions can only rearrange the initials and names but not change inadequate delivery capacity. How many decades of watching this happen across entire states should be tolerated before the top priority

As a cushion for the claim of inability to result in the necessary increased capacity, note
  1. The substantial increased cost of delivery via new regulations and certifications that can only make the financial design and capacity worse.
  2. 30 - 50% greater than average population growth in 2600 lowest physician concentration counties over the past 5 decades - not surprising given the inability of more Americans to pay for housing and other basics where workforce, property values, and cost of living are most concentrated
  3. 2600 lowest concentration counties with higher concentrations of elderly and complexity. 
  4. This is a massive increase in demand where 40% of Americans fall further behind by designs that fail for generalists and general specialties that are 90% of local services in these counties. 
  5. Compare this to 1100 zip codes with 10% of the population that have 45% of physicians and greater than 50% of health spending - leaving little for most Americans by designs that concentrate the most lines of revenue and the highest reimbursements in each line.
  6. Fewest remaining in primary care positions, particularly family practice positions across all sources, as the financial design rewards more new specialties with more added in each specialty

Recent Blogs 

Keeping Perspective Is Challenging Because of Turbulent Health Care Design

Disregarding Humanity - The Great Health Care Debate Ignored

Losing the Super Bowl Year After Year in Health Care

Focus on Finances Not International Graduates

Start with CHIP to Return to Sanity

Demographics Against the Democrats

Exploring Designs Favoring Blue Over Red

Scientists Fail at Science involving Physicians and Politics

Six Degrees of Discrimination By Health Care Payment Design

TeleOutreach or TeleProfiteering

The Tyranny of Health Care Research

Necessary Rather than Disruptive Transformations

Best of Basic Health Access Blogs

Does Academia Compromise Health Care for Most Americans?


Robert C. Bowman, M.D.        Robert.Bowman@DignityHealth.org

The blogs represent the opinion of the blogger alone.
Copyright 2017




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Fine CMS You Have Gotten Us Into

Perhaps we are indeed back to the time of Another Fine Mess (Laurel and Hardy). In a mad rush to implement innovation and to save all possible costs, CMS is creating complications for people that it is most responsible to protect. As PBS and Ken Burns celebrate the legacy of The Roosevelts, it is tragic to see what has become of over a century of effort involving Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and health care equity. The United States has one of the most complex health designs and clearly the various designers often know not what they are doing to others. More cartoons and comedians would find this a ripe area for material if not for the suffering involved. Health and Human Services has a huge role across Social Security and US health care. CMS or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has a dominant role to play in the design of health care in the United States.  CMS can be progressive or regressive. Interestingly CMS has chosen to appear to be progressive and in
Read more

The Essential True Reform Restores Primary Care and Much More

The list of distractions from True Reform are impressive. For decades True Reform has been specifically avoided as primary care worsens within practices and from outside. The demise is most specifically about the financial design. Unless there is a focus on True Reform, there is little hope for Basic Health Access. This may not make as much sense to those outside of family medicine. Family physicians not familiar with AAFP may also be clueless. If you think that you can fix primary care with more technology, more rearrangements, more types of health professional graduates, or more expansions of training - think again. None of these have any hope of working without financial design changes - major changes. The following are various concepts that dominate the discussions at AAFP and primary care meetings and media releases of associations and foundations and institutions. Members, staff, media releases, programs, and personnel have been reviewed.  There is little about Tru
Read more

Innovation Is the Problem Not the Solution for Worsening Health

Image
Innovation is good. Innovation worship is not good. Innovation application without scientific testing or clinical trials is unethical regarding clinical interventions and should be just as prohibited with regard to health policy. Clinical trials can harm hundreds or thousands. Innovative policies can harm millions. It takes a reasonable understanding of health care, health care outcomes, social determinants, and the investments that most improve social determinants to understand the consequences arising from the innovative nightmares past, present, and future. If you review the information sources with a critical eye, you too may find that the innovative policy designs have been disruptive to care, have hurt health care where health care is most needed, have reduced access to care, and have resulted in distortions in the literature. Indeed what is accepted and published in journals seriously lacks consideration of alternative hypothesis, lacks inclusion of many pages of limitatio
Read more