Mastering Well Being for Residents Physicians and Patients Takes Time

During this time of "value" focus, we have apparently replaced the temporary focus upon reflective practice. Recent patient care experiences confirm the value of reflection as there are so many dimensions of learning available, especially compared to the few via biomedical focus. Well being is about restorative time. Across residency training and primary care practice, there is an assault on this time and the value of such efforts. A major theme for practice or for patients or for those in training is the value of rest and reflection time.

The most important learning requires rest and reflection - and these require time. Well-being is compromised when rest, reflection, and sleep are compromised.

Too often it is easier to just work toward the end of the day. It is easier to speak too soon, listen too little, or jump to treatment as seen in too much medication. It is harder to insure best communication or to go the extra mile to impact the care experience of a child or a new parent or a suffering patient in need of support.

The research in primary care confirms movement away from support and more disruption of team members as well as increases in burnout and other consequences.

The research finally appreciates the complexity of primary care - finally. Given the three times greater contribution of family medicine toward care of the elderly, one would have expected this realization long ago. Higher concentrations of complexity in places and populations with  lesser resources add to the complexity and this is multiplied for family medicine physicians.

Family medicine needs to make a stand for better support for primary care and also for better support for residents.When this is something that we face and understand, we need to stand up and be counted.

The sad direction of Graduate Medical Education indicates a return to higher probability of sleep disruption. Even worse the focus has become reducing hand offs rather than improving team work and communication.

  • Better team care, communication, empathy, and service orientation requires more support in the form of more team members and more colleagues to share the load. We should not tolerate designs for more to do with less support and more hours a day required with less sleep remaining and disrupted sleep patterns.

Primary care must have a better financial design. Graduate medical education has a better financial design and we should hold it accountable for better learning and better support of residents. Since we never stop learning, we should not tolerate distractions from this focus for residents and for our learning from interactions with our patients, team members, and communities.

Compassion, empathy, life-long learning, and the patience to deal with differences in languages, expectations, regulations, documentation, and health literacy require more support and adequate restorative sleep for the team members that work closest with patients. We require reflective time for what we do with patients, with our own families, and with ourselves.

The designs for residency and for primary care practice move residents and primary care physicians the wrong directions.

It is time to stop the distractions and focus on what is best for our well being as this is clearly what is best for the well being of our patients.

Comments

  1. UnknownApril 7, 2017 at 2:51 AM

    I’m really amazed with your posting skills as well as with the layout on your blog site.
    Very informative and well written post! Quite interesting and nice topic chosen for the post Nice Post keep it up.Excellent post.
    Patient Deductible

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Fine CMS You Have Gotten Us Into

Perhaps we are indeed back to the time of Another Fine Mess (Laurel and Hardy). In a mad rush to implement innovation and to save all possible costs, CMS is creating complications for people that it is most responsible to protect. As PBS and Ken Burns celebrate the legacy of The Roosevelts, it is tragic to see what has become of over a century of effort involving Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and health care equity. The United States has one of the most complex health designs and clearly the various designers often know not what they are doing to others. More cartoons and comedians would find this a ripe area for material if not for the suffering involved. Health and Human Services has a huge role across Social Security and US health care. CMS or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has a dominant role to play in the design of health care in the United States.  CMS can be progressive or regressive. Interestingly CMS has chosen to appear to be progressive and in
Read more

The Essential True Reform Restores Primary Care and Much More

The list of distractions from True Reform are impressive. For decades True Reform has been specifically avoided as primary care worsens within practices and from outside. The demise is most specifically about the financial design. Unless there is a focus on True Reform, there is little hope for Basic Health Access. This may not make as much sense to those outside of family medicine. Family physicians not familiar with AAFP may also be clueless. If you think that you can fix primary care with more technology, more rearrangements, more types of health professional graduates, or more expansions of training - think again. None of these have any hope of working without financial design changes - major changes. The following are various concepts that dominate the discussions at AAFP and primary care meetings and media releases of associations and foundations and institutions. Members, staff, media releases, programs, and personnel have been reviewed.  There is little about Tru
Read more

Innovation Is the Problem Not the Solution for Worsening Health

Image
Innovation is good. Innovation worship is not good. Innovation application without scientific testing or clinical trials is unethical regarding clinical interventions and should be just as prohibited with regard to health policy. Clinical trials can harm hundreds or thousands. Innovative policies can harm millions. It takes a reasonable understanding of health care, health care outcomes, social determinants, and the investments that most improve social determinants to understand the consequences arising from the innovative nightmares past, present, and future. If you review the information sources with a critical eye, you too may find that the innovative policy designs have been disruptive to care, have hurt health care where health care is most needed, have reduced access to care, and have resulted in distortions in the literature. Indeed what is accepted and published in journals seriously lacks consideration of alternative hypothesis, lacks inclusion of many pages of limitatio
Read more