Payment Prevents Primary Care Result - No More Match Follies

Year after year various primary care associations get excited to find out the results of the match or residency choices of medical students. It is quite interesting to see how so little change is promoted so much. Even a small increase of a few dozen graduates is celebrated.

Such celebrations hide the tragedy shaped by primary care payment design. This is best seen in family medicine, by far the best remaining source of primary care.

Changes over time indicate the likely result of increased family medicine graduates. The increase from 2900 to 3200 seems significant at 10% growth. But over the same time period family medicine residency graduates have been choosing other career paths involving emergency care, hospitalist careers, urgent care, and other specialties. The specialty once 90% retained in primary care is down to below 70%. The impact of the actual primary care result is shown below:


Annual Graduates Increase in Graduates Active in FM Positions Over Career Actual FM Result By Class Year Decrease in Actual Primary Care Result
FM Grad 2000 2900 90% 2610
FM Grad 2017 3200 10.3% 70% 2240 -14.2%

Actual primary care result is about retention in primary care positions. Losses of primary care are steadily shaped by the financial design. Too little support results in 
  • Fewer choosing primary care training
  • Fewer entering primary care positions after primary care training
  • Fewer remaining in primary care positions over careers
Primary care associations need to focus upon the financial design to address primary care needs. Massive expansions of graduates are not capable of addressing increased primary care. There are only a limited number of supported primary care positions due to payments too low and cost of delivery too high and getting higher. 

Primary care leaders that trumpet match success are preventing financial changes that would actually increase 
  • the numbers of graduates
  • the members in primary care associations
  • primary care retention
  • primary care distribution
  • basic health access
  • improved support of team members
  • higher primary care functions
The shrinking financial design is what impairs basic health access.


Recent Blogs 

Good Better and Best Value in Primary Care Leadership

How Can CMS Improve Value In the Most Valuable?

Frying Pan to Fire for Red Counties

Demographics Against the Democrats

Exploring Designs Favoring Blue Over Red

Keeping Perspective Is Challenging Because of Turbulent Health Care Design

The Tyranny of Health Care Research

Should Medical Associations Preach Evidence Basis (while not keeping it as in MOC, P4P, true primary care solutions)?

Disregarding Humanity - The Great Health Care Debate Ignored

Losing the Super Bowl Year After Year in Health Care

Focus on Finances Not International Graduates

Six Degrees of Discrimination By Health Care Payment Design

Best of Basic Health Access Blogs

Does Academia Compromise Health Care for Most Americans?


Robert C. Bowman, M.D.        Robert.Bowman@DignityHealth.org

The blogs represent the opinion of the blogger alone.
Copyright 2017 





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Fine CMS You Have Gotten Us Into

Perhaps we are indeed back to the time of Another Fine Mess (Laurel and Hardy). In a mad rush to implement innovation and to save all possible costs, CMS is creating complications for people that it is most responsible to protect. As PBS and Ken Burns celebrate the legacy of The Roosevelts, it is tragic to see what has become of over a century of effort involving Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and health care equity. The United States has one of the most complex health designs and clearly the various designers often know not what they are doing to others. More cartoons and comedians would find this a ripe area for material if not for the suffering involved. Health and Human Services has a huge role across Social Security and US health care. CMS or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has a dominant role to play in the design of health care in the United States.  CMS can be progressive or regressive. Interestingly CMS has chosen to appear to be progressive and in
Read more

The Essential True Reform Restores Primary Care and Much More

The list of distractions from True Reform are impressive. For decades True Reform has been specifically avoided as primary care worsens within practices and from outside. The demise is most specifically about the financial design. Unless there is a focus on True Reform, there is little hope for Basic Health Access. This may not make as much sense to those outside of family medicine. Family physicians not familiar with AAFP may also be clueless. If you think that you can fix primary care with more technology, more rearrangements, more types of health professional graduates, or more expansions of training - think again. None of these have any hope of working without financial design changes - major changes. The following are various concepts that dominate the discussions at AAFP and primary care meetings and media releases of associations and foundations and institutions. Members, staff, media releases, programs, and personnel have been reviewed.  There is little about Tru
Read more

Why not inside out empowerment rather than outside in abuse?

Just in from Annals of Family Medicine (Miller, Rubenstein, Howard, Crabtree) Shifting Implementation Science Theory to Empower Primary Care Practices Hope for primary care, generalists, rural health, and care where needed requires a very different perspective after decades of failed designs. Not surprisingly this will need to come from inside of these practices and places. Not surprisingly policies and practices dictated from outside have been not only a poor fit - but have been abusive to the populations most in need of care and the practices that serve them. There is hope from the primary care research community. The perspective must be inside of practice looking out - instead of outsiders forcing changes. Qualitative research explores and discovers and reflects as Ben, Will, and others taught me along with the various rural family physicians interviewed and researched in the 1990s in Nebraska. The current focus on quantitative research has demonstrated little to
Read more