More Quality Measures for Homebound Seniors - Not Hardly

Quality measurement focus has resulted in higher cost, distractions from care, and lower productivity. Articles proposing more quality measure emphasis may be popular but will not move homebound seniors toward the care that they need. An understanding of the situations facing homebound seniors is required.
 
Based on higher levels of disabled payments, Social Security payments, Medicare patients, Medicaid patients, seniors, obesity, smoking, and sedentary lifestyle at least 45% of homebound seniors are found in 2621 lowest physician concentration counties.
 
It helps to have access to care and workforce to provide care and local resources and many other areas addressed before more quality measures.
 
Homebound seniors where care is needed face
  • Lack of mobility - condition, housing
  • Lack of transportation - due to family situations and lesser public transportation
  • Lack of insurance competition
  • Insurers who avoid them due to cost and complexity
  • Providers who avoid them due to payment too low
  • Lack of access to basic health care due to least local workforce also due to payment design - 21% of physicians for 40% of the population with only 23.5% of mental health providers and only 26% of NP and PA
  • Lack of access to a local pharmacy - insurance companies and drug companies have created mail order diversions away from local as well as middlemen driving up prices and also driving small pharmacists out
  • Providers who avoid them as their needs cannot be met within the payments provided (despite EMTALA and requirements by insurance) 
  • Burnout increasing for the local workforce including 36% of family physicians to serve this 45% segment. The lowest concentration county workforce that remains is left increasingly alone
  • Declining health care situations due to fastest growing populations, fastest growing elderly, and fastest growth in complexity and demand
  • Austerity focus that is depleting local resources, food, cash flow, jobs, and resources.
  • Small increases in Social Security of 20 dollars a month can result in $50 or more dollars lost in food stamps.

Quality measures and the increased costs of quality measures and the increased distractions of quality measures and the greater burnout due to quality measures is a questionable intervention. 
 
At least the authors did mention social determinants and home bound interventions that can actually help cost, quality, and access - but they chose to focus on measures rather than solutions to address care and outcomes.

Outcomes Are About People Factors, Not Measures

Changes in people are needed for quality improvements in ways that cannot be measured well. Investing more in clinical interventions is the problem, not the solution.

Changes are needed in behaviors, situations, environments, social determinants. Changes in access are needed. Changes in people changing payments are needed - up for primary care mental health office cognitive basic and oldest - which we have neglected for decades causing the physician deficits and access barriers. Real payment reform is needed.

Leaders Point to Solutions

We need leaders to point to the right changes in health care design and in designs for nutrition, housing, transportation, child development, and other people changing investments.
 
 

What Is Stunning in Primary Care Is No Change By Design

Oregon PCMH Saved 240 Million But Spent Over 250 Million

Blood Clots or How Dr. House Breaks Down the United States

Seeds of Health Improvement Fail on Barren US Soil...


Six Degrees of Discrimination By Health Care Payment Design


Most Visited Early Blogs


Three Dimensions of Non-Primary Care vs Zero Growth in Primary Care  

Finance-me-cratic Constants in the Bureaucratic Universe  

Meeting Primary Care Needs in the Last Half of the 21st Century 

Exploring the Health Consequences of Disease Focus  

Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane.
Martin Luther King, Jr. 

Robert C. Bowman, M.D.        Robert.Bowman@DignityHealth.org

The blogs represent the opinion of the blogger alone.
Copyright 2016

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Fine CMS You Have Gotten Us Into

Perhaps we are indeed back to the time of Another Fine Mess (Laurel and Hardy). In a mad rush to implement innovation and to save all possible costs, CMS is creating complications for people that it is most responsible to protect. As PBS and Ken Burns celebrate the legacy of The Roosevelts, it is tragic to see what has become of over a century of effort involving Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and health care equity. The United States has one of the most complex health designs and clearly the various designers often know not what they are doing to others. More cartoons and comedians would find this a ripe area for material if not for the suffering involved. Health and Human Services has a huge role across Social Security and US health care. CMS or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has a dominant role to play in the design of health care in the United States.  CMS can be progressive or regressive. Interestingly CMS has chosen to appear to be progressive and in
Read more

The Essential True Reform Restores Primary Care and Much More

The list of distractions from True Reform are impressive. For decades True Reform has been specifically avoided as primary care worsens within practices and from outside. The demise is most specifically about the financial design. Unless there is a focus on True Reform, there is little hope for Basic Health Access. This may not make as much sense to those outside of family medicine. Family physicians not familiar with AAFP may also be clueless. If you think that you can fix primary care with more technology, more rearrangements, more types of health professional graduates, or more expansions of training - think again. None of these have any hope of working without financial design changes - major changes. The following are various concepts that dominate the discussions at AAFP and primary care meetings and media releases of associations and foundations and institutions. Members, staff, media releases, programs, and personnel have been reviewed.  There is little about Tru
Read more

Innovation Is the Problem Not the Solution for Worsening Health

Image
Innovation is good. Innovation worship is not good. Innovation application without scientific testing or clinical trials is unethical regarding clinical interventions and should be just as prohibited with regard to health policy. Clinical trials can harm hundreds or thousands. Innovative policies can harm millions. It takes a reasonable understanding of health care, health care outcomes, social determinants, and the investments that most improve social determinants to understand the consequences arising from the innovative nightmares past, present, and future. If you review the information sources with a critical eye, you too may find that the innovative policy designs have been disruptive to care, have hurt health care where health care is most needed, have reduced access to care, and have resulted in distortions in the literature. Indeed what is accepted and published in journals seriously lacks consideration of alternative hypothesis, lacks inclusion of many pages of limitatio
Read more