Can Primary Care Survive Devaluation by CEOs and Government

Unprecedented decreases in morale and productivity have been seen across primary care in recent years. It is very clear that team members have faced rapid changes and increasing care demands along with declining support while patients and situations have increased in complexity. Health care leaders are not paying attention. There has been no progress to improve support or to decrease the challenges.

Even worse, primary care leaders get poor ratings as they spend their time and effort and scarce resources on areas that will not reverse marginalization, burnout, turnover, and productivity problems.

A recent RAND study was very relevant and indicated increasing concerns regarding the ability to best care for patients and have been sent through formal family medicine channels. Studies document the proliferation of additional work hours before and after patient care. Numerous studies indicate the higher costs from HITECH to MACRA and for primary care medical home. These are designs that can only marginalize the team members that are forced to comply.

A recent interview of the CEO of Geisinger promotes how they are changing health care while rearranging incentives for physicians.The following is what was printed with my numbering:

  1. “take great care of patients; 
  2. treat patients like they are your family; 
  3. help us with same-day access, so occasionally that means staying late, 
  4. occasionally that means coming in on a Saturday; 
  5. help us with recruitment and retention, because we want to 
  6. make it a great place to work; 
  7. be engaged in our teaching 
  8. and research, 
  9. talk to patients about the genome study; and finally, 
  10. be a good citizen— run on time, don't use foul language, volunteer for committees, that kind of stuff. 
If you do those five things, we're going to pay you.”

http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20170304/MAGAZINE/303049958/qa-lets-stop-complaining-about-social-determinants-of-health-and?

CEOs are great on statistics regarding profit but are short on counting ability such as counting the additional duties and the additional hours. There is an obvious discounting of time for family and personal life.

Substantial replacement of physicians is also indicated in reviews of county workforce 2005 to 2013 where Geisinger is dominant. 

Primary Care Marginalization


Primary care once depended upon a physician-nurse team. Now less costly and less trained personnel are all that primary care can afford - as per payment design. Turnover impairs continuity across primary care team members. 

Departures of physicians and clinicians from primary care to better paid positions (urgent, emergent, hospitalist, specialties, administrative) all shrink the primary care workforce by turnover impacts. Another problem result is the decreasing experience levels of those who interface one on one with primary care patients.
 
Hospital, subspecialty, and outpatient care are all paid at higher levels and this allows delivery of such services with more personnel that have more training and more health care experience along with better support. This is inherent in the payment design. 

DRG design had a substantial impact as patients were dumped from higher resourced hospitals to lesser resourced primary care. The design resulted in the rise of hospitalist workforce to send patients home faster using less resources and now 50,000 primary care trained physicians are hospitalists.

It is the payment design that most interests CEOs, deans, and others. Departments, divisions, programs, and practices mired in lowest payments and higher cost of delivery will be marginalized. 

The factors that decrease productivity and increase burnout have become institutionalized as seen in the thoughts and statements from CEOs, CMS officials, government, associations, foundations, and politicians. 

Primary Care Must Be Valued By Primary Care Leaders

How can you claim to have value for health access or for primary care when your graduates are falling away from primary care before, during, and after training? 

Even family medicine leaders appear to be misguided. They are fiddling as family physicians fall from 95% employed in family practice positions for active graduates is down to just 70%. The rural outcomes have dropped from 30% to 20% over past decades. Family medicine has remained mired at 3000 annual graduates for 37 years and many millions of dollars and dozens of efforts have not changed what better financial design could change in only a short time. Family medicine, NP and PA graduates remaining in family practice positions remain 36% found where 40% of the population resides in 2621 lowest physician concentration counties - but fewer remaining in family practice positions is concerning as this is a direct threat to all that primary care can be. 

ll sources have declined to fewer and fewer who are active and found in primary care positions. Family practice positions filled are by far the most important and NP and PA move steadily away from family practice positions as dictated by design. The massive expansions of nurse practitioners and physician assistants have replaced the collapsing general internal medicine workforce, but more and more graduates are required to produce the same primary care. Stagnant primary care delivery capacity coupled with failing mental health and general surgical specialties is exactly the wrong result at a time with demand increasing most in these areas and most of all in the lowest physician concentration counties with greatest growth of population, elderly, complexity, and demand.

Recent Blogs 

Good Better and Best Value in Primary Care Leadership

How Can CMS Improve Value In the Most Valuable?

Frying Pan to Fire for Red Counties

Demographics Against the Democrats

Exploring Designs Favoring Blue Over Red

Keeping Perspective Is Challenging Because of Turbulent Health Care Design

The Tyranny of Health Care Research

Should Medical Associations Preach Evidence Basis (while not keeping it as in MOC, P4P, true primary care solutions)?

Disregarding Humanity - The Great Health Care Debate Ignored

Losing the Super Bowl Year After Year in Health Care

Focus on Finances Not International Graduates

Six Degrees of Discrimination By Health Care Payment Design

Best of Basic Health Access Blogs

Does Academia Compromise Health Care for Most Americans?


Robert C. Bowman, M.D.        Robert.Bowman@DignityHealth.org

The blogs represent the opinion of the blogger alone.
Copyright 2017 




 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Fine CMS You Have Gotten Us Into

Perhaps we are indeed back to the time of Another Fine Mess (Laurel and Hardy). In a mad rush to implement innovation and to save all possible costs, CMS is creating complications for people that it is most responsible to protect. As PBS and Ken Burns celebrate the legacy of The Roosevelts, it is tragic to see what has become of over a century of effort involving Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and health care equity. The United States has one of the most complex health designs and clearly the various designers often know not what they are doing to others. More cartoons and comedians would find this a ripe area for material if not for the suffering involved. Health and Human Services has a huge role across Social Security and US health care. CMS or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has a dominant role to play in the design of health care in the United States.  CMS can be progressive or regressive. Interestingly CMS has chosen to appear to be progressive and in
Read more

The Essential True Reform Restores Primary Care and Much More

The list of distractions from True Reform are impressive. For decades True Reform has been specifically avoided as primary care worsens within practices and from outside. The demise is most specifically about the financial design. Unless there is a focus on True Reform, there is little hope for Basic Health Access. This may not make as much sense to those outside of family medicine. Family physicians not familiar with AAFP may also be clueless. If you think that you can fix primary care with more technology, more rearrangements, more types of health professional graduates, or more expansions of training - think again. None of these have any hope of working without financial design changes - major changes. The following are various concepts that dominate the discussions at AAFP and primary care meetings and media releases of associations and foundations and institutions. Members, staff, media releases, programs, and personnel have been reviewed.  There is little about Tru
Read more

Why not inside out empowerment rather than outside in abuse?

Just in from Annals of Family Medicine (Miller, Rubenstein, Howard, Crabtree) Shifting Implementation Science Theory to Empower Primary Care Practices Hope for primary care, generalists, rural health, and care where needed requires a very different perspective after decades of failed designs. Not surprisingly this will need to come from inside of these practices and places. Not surprisingly policies and practices dictated from outside have been not only a poor fit - but have been abusive to the populations most in need of care and the practices that serve them. There is hope from the primary care research community. The perspective must be inside of practice looking out - instead of outsiders forcing changes. Qualitative research explores and discovers and reflects as Ben, Will, and others taught me along with the various rural family physicians interviewed and researched in the 1990s in Nebraska. The current focus on quantitative research has demonstrated little to
Read more