Getting To Rural Practice and Getting Rural Practice
Getting to rural practice is often about a calling and a response, as it was in
my case. Sometimes the career is thrust upon us. Taking a cue from Shakespeare,
Some are born rural, some achieve ruralness, and some have rural thrust upon them.
Some are born rural, some achieve ruralness, and some have rural thrust upon them.
Regardless of the
route to rural practice, the journey is often neglected. The need for a journey
or path has long been marginalized as in paths to rural practice, to primary
care, or to care where needed.
The emails awaiting me this morning back to back were about
rural training and apprenticeship - coincidence?
"People who commit themselves for
a cause have a right to expect training in the job for which they have been
selected. In some of the trades, this is called “apprenticeship.” In medicine,
it is known as “internship.” In the military, it is referred to as “basic
training.” In scripture, it is referred to as “discipleship.” However, in our
modern day, training is often by-passed due to the pressures of time, need and
a low value placed upon the office to be filled. This was not the case with
Jesus in His selection and training of His disciples." - Standing Strong Through The
Storm (SSTS),
Paul Estabrooks, Training in Righteousness
July 10, 2014
Rural medicine is indeed a way of life with rural living a
key component. One of the best rural practice speakers by far was Bob Boyer MD
- longterm rural doc in Kingman KS. His talk was about the barriers to rural
practice and how those barriers were overcome using rural site and rural
preceptorship examples. (See The Blizzard) His final story was about a complicated delivery
resulting in a prolapsed inverted uterus. This rare and life-threatening event occurred during a blizzard with just he, the
nurse, the patient, her husband, some Penthrane (like ether), and a phone call
connection to his OB mentor at a hotel in Omaha far away from Kingman. The connections that we make shape our lives and the lives of others - especially in health care.
We followed Bob's great stories in Kansas City with small groups to address 4 levels from early student interest to senior FM resident info.
We followed Bob's great stories in Kansas City with small groups to address 4 levels from early student interest to senior FM resident info.
1. Bob talked about
rural practice and rural living and he always had a good draw of those in the
room (puzzling to me until I understood more about the importance of rural life
and living)
2. Setting up rural experiences (for medical students)
3. Choosing a rural
residency (for students)
4. Choosing a rural practice (for residents)
Sometimes we combined
choosing with using your rural residency, emphasizing the procedural component. Program directors and recruiters from not for profits contributed to this event.
My favorite feedback comments came from senior residents or
sometimes their spouses - who said that they now remembered why they got into a
medical career in the first place.
There was one (of about 12) session that I
experienced that was the best session by far. I talked to Bob after this one. He noted that the best storytellers tell their story to a person in the
audience. In this case, the person that he told his stories to was the spouse
of a second year family medicine resident sitting in the middle of the room.
She was about 8 months pregnant. The connection was electric.
Connections are the
key
We ignore connections and many of the most important areas -
such as "the why." Motivation, morale, commitment, and much of life meaning is about connection.
When we cannot get students before, during, or after medical
school to experience rural life, rural practice, rural communities, and what we
all value - we will remain limited and often so will they.
Now that we know long term rural continuity training can be
the best medical education, there is no reason not to do so.
It is my opinion that
traditional medical education is deteriorating with overall health education in worse shape. Twenty years ago we could
demonstrate equivalency between rural training and typical training. In the
past decades marginalization has taken a toll. Getting away from marginalization is important.
We were always limited as rural medical educators because we were forced to apply traditional measures rather than measures that were more about primary care, health access, and practice, especially rural practice.
We were always limited as rural medical educators because we were forced to apply traditional measures rather than measures that were more about primary care, health access, and practice, especially rural practice.
Academic experiences are limiting. This is why it took rural physicians moving into academics to connect what is most important.
Jack Verby was a rural doc for 20 years and RPAP MN director for 20years. He learned about the limitations of academic measurements and developed
measures specific to rural practice - areas such as confidence, competence, and comfort levels. For example studies demonstrated students overwhelmed at 3 months of
rural experience, neutral at 6, and did not want to leave at 9 months
(particularly when sent back to the academic center for year 4).
The RPAP
experience was about becoming a part of the care delivery team, the practice,
the community, and a part of other people's lives. RPAP students also contribute to local care delivery because they are connected as a part of the team - about $40,000 to $70,000 more care as estimated by Verby. This is different compared to short term rural exposures that can take more than giving because of time spent in orientation and other prep for an experience that never connects.
So much of the time primary care or rural experiences are
just exposures - a rotating series of events to pass through on the way to graduation. Primary care and health access careers deserve much more as do half of Americans left behind by this training design.
Simplified training
for medical students, nurse practitioners, or physician assistants might
address cost factors, but not the most important factors. The pressures of time
or "too much to learn" result in a loss of what to learn and why. Few
are preceptorships or internships or involve relationships of any kind.
Without relationship there is not
perspective - to your supervising preceptor, the practice, the community,
various people in the community - not only for the student or resident but also
for their family. As we know, the family may be more important than the
physician.
This is also why it is difficult to
leave rural practice for full time academics. Those of us who have attempt to do rural training
- because the training is back in rural practice.
Taking training away from rural sites
has been a 100 years mistake, with only some recent recovery and in small
scale.
Moving away from broadest generalist
family practice has been a 100 years mistake, as yet without recovery as we
still do not have 3 years prep, 3 years med school, 3 years FM - all specific
to rural family practice and all taught at a rural family practice site.
Hopefully we will one day lament this
past time period - Why would learning ever be suppressed, and in so many
dimensions?
A nice article appeared in Rural and Remote Health regarding Geographical and seasonal barriers to mammography services and breast cancer stage at diagnosis Time, distance, and other barriers are important to understand and the designers of health care often fail to understand the consequences of their designs.
A nice article appeared in Rural and Remote Health regarding Geographical and seasonal barriers to mammography services and breast cancer stage at diagnosis Time, distance, and other barriers are important to understand and the designers of health care often fail to understand the consequences of their designs.
Thanks to RuralMed and rural colleagues for the multiple perspectives that tuned this piece
and brought back so many pleasant memories and hopes of more to come. One other contributor
to this has been some recent correspondence with Homer Flora, DO. He reached
out from retirement at age 93 to reflect back on 1980s rural practice in the
town we shared for 4 years - Nowata OK. He was gracious to note how the
hospital should have adopted some of my proposals (senior living, community
health activities).
It was also good for me to acknowledge his contributions to
me as a rural mentor. He was a GP and was by far the best anesthesiologist I
have seen, impeccable charting and an efficient practice and use of personnel
such that nearly all his time was face to face with lots of faces seen per day
from 1954 to 1993. He was the primary supporter of 2 hospitals and was by far
the most important individual local economic contributor. I still use his
techniques with consultants. He would listen to a talk and then had specific
questions about patients he had seen. You could see him learning more about
what he could do (expand his cutting edge) and about how to best refer and
when). I heard from his daughter also and was glad to hear that the town honored him in a mile long parade when he
retired, but then he delivered care at a reservation practice and did locus.
From my first rural research effort that reached publication - One rural doc
was advised by his rural doc father not to practice in the same town. He was
told to "go somewhere else and make your own enemies." Only those who
experience rural understand such relationship - love, competition, conflict,
belonging, and often in the same people - real life worth living.
Will Teaching Community Health Centers "Get It?" - May take some time.Best of Basic Health Access
Robert C. Bowman, M.D.
www.basichealthaccess.blogspot.com
SMART Basic Health Access
www.ruralmedicaleducation.org
Comments
Post a Comment