Health Access Failure from the Start

Health Access Results Can Be Multiplied By Earliest Investments and Specific Health Access Focus. A Continuation of the Current Design Will Fail Most Americans.

 A common mistake is believing that you can impact the end points (college tracks, medical school influences, loan repayments). When you are talking about national outcomes and improvements, the end points are far too late as they are dependent upon "the matrix of relationships" as Deming often noted. Previous life experiences shape subsequent encounters and situations. Health care is one of the ultimate examples of complexity - and even the best research fails to consider the numerous pre-existing influences that shape health outcomes.

Birth to Higher Education Pipeline Failure

 Prevention of higher education and medical school from the start.
From a 2013 New York Times Article - Andreas Schleicher, who runs the O.E.C.D.’s international educational assessments, put it to me this way: “The bottom line is that the vast majority of O.E.C.D. countries either invest equally into every student or disproportionately more into disadvantaged students. The U.S. is one of the few countries doing the opposite.” The inequity of education finance in the United States is a feature of the system, not a bug, stemming from its great degree of decentralization and its reliance on local property taxes.      

Each of these results in disadvantage for most children as measured by lower probability of higher education and medical school admission as well as higher probability for children of advantage.

 Dividing the Nation By Income in Medical School Admission
  • Over 60% of Medical Students arise from the top 20% in Parent Income (AAMC data) 
  • 20% arise from the second 20% - equity
  • Less than 20% arise from the bottom 60% of American children (AAMC data)
  • Lower income rural county origins and Mexican American populations have 5 times lower probability of admission
The problem is not necessarily with medical school admission as the same situations are found in higher education. College has been a prerequisite for medical school for 100 years. 

Dividing the Nation By Income in Higher Education
Highest Income Origin, Most Urban Origin, Children of Highest Educated/Professional Parents appear to benefit from a widening gap as compared to other origins as seen in data regarding US medical students.

Even when not gaining admission to a US MD school, the expanding osteopathic and Caribbean opportunities and other international schools (US born Asians going to Asian nations for medical school) offer more routes to becoming a physician.

Normal children in America have little chance with lesser opportunity shaped by design. Those most different and unlike most Americans in a number of dimensions are more likely to become US physicians.

Physicians with Origins Immersed in Top Concentrations from Birth to Graduation
  • Are least likely to choose primary care
  • Are least likely to remain in primary care when training in primary care
  • Are least likely to choose family medicine
  • Are least likely to remain in core specialties
  • Are least likely to distribute where needed
  • Often move state to state, failing to remain in states in need of workforce - reinforced by more specialized careers that dictate states, counties, zip codes, and practices
Origin changes, training changes, and policy changes all contribute to family medicine choice cut in half and internal medicine primary care retention cut from 60% to less than 20% in the past 18 years. Family medicine and internal medicine primary care

  • Represent 33 - 40% of physician workforce where workforce is needed
  • Are the most important sources of health care for the elderly populations that are doubling from 2010 to 2040
  • Are the most important sources where counties are growing the fastest in population growth and in primary care demand.
  • Since internal medicine primary care is steadily declining, the family practice sources are even more important.

The United States will continue to produce Too Many and Still the Wrong Physicians    


Solutions for Health Access Are the Opposite of the Designs for Training and Practice Support
  • Instate location for 30 states behind, not 6 - 10 states with top concentrations of physicians and graduate medical education 
  • Primary care - permanent over a career, not just during training
  • Workforce in counties and zip codes in need of workforce such as 2600 counties with lowest concentrations of clinicians and 40% of the United States population
State public medical schools have been admitting more highest income, most urban, children of professionals that move from state to state. These students have replaced students who are more average in income, normal to rural in geographic origin, and those from a wider range of parent education and occupation. 

In Nebraska the family medicine choice of those that dominate admissions is 2%. Those steadily being replaced over recent decades are those more connected to the state with a wider range of origins that have 15 - 30% family medicine choice, better primary care, and higher instate retention. Choice of family medicine at UNMC is associated with over 20 times more instate practice location in the 88 counties in need of workforce out of 93 in Nebraska. Family medicine more than triples distribution where needed, but it is more than just family medicine as the characteristics that result in family medicine also result in better distribution. This is why you cannot just influence health access or family medicine choice in medical school or late in the game. 

Real solutions focus upon the instate, permanent primary care, and workforce where needed very specifically across origins, preparation, all training, and practice support. 

In Kansas the family medicine choice is a 16 times multiplier of Kansas practice in 98 counties in need of workforce as compared to practice elsewhere out of state or in Kansas counties with top concentrations of clinicians. 

If we are to ever deal with health disparities, the patients and the clinicians must be addressed.

Most American patients need a better start. They also need a physician that is more like them in origins and one that is trained specifically for their needs. Our "one size fits none" medical education design is least specific for care where needed and Americans most in need of care.

We must deal with designs that are causative with regard to disparities. Some like to blame individuals for their plight, but these arguments go away when we are talking about designs, designs for education, and impacts on children who are dependent upon our designs. Our nation is dependent upon child development and early education for outcomes outcomes across education, economics, jobs, ideas, and health.

Designs that impact before birth, in the first months, and in the first years of life are important to understand. Our  has very little investment in education - less than 8% of school funding. The financial responsibility is at the state level - for adequate funding and to address inequitable funding due to local school districts that have little property value to tax. Some states do very little, and some states provide 60% or more of funding. States that invest more and less, would not surprise you as the same states that invest more do better in a number of outcomes.

Insufficient funding is bad, and property based taxation is even worse as lower property value schoolchildren face the worst discrimination. And when states fail in school funding distributions they are failing in jobs and economic impact for these school districts. And these areas of a state are even more dependent upon such spending in education, health, social security, and other areas for substantially more of their economics.

When Katrina hit, Houston Independent School District was able to absorb a substantial portion of the refugees into Houston schools - because it was in better financial shape, because the legislature required cash reserves, and because HISD accepted the challenge. The central metro areas have been losing out to suburbs, the legislature has slashed funding, and lawsuits have been required to attempt to address worsening situations for Texas schoolchildren statewide. How things have changed an in a short period of time. Now the deficits of funding impact the entire state, especially the school districts facing the greatest challenges. Even the higher property value school districts are feeling the effects. Within school districts there are also tough choices. 

Do the districts make the tough choices to attempt to meet the needs of most children, or do they shape their spending and programs to favor the children of advantage as their powerful parents continue to demand?

I see the same theme across education, health, primary care, economics, and health spending. With declines, those doing well cling more to what they have, sending more into a downward spiral and even those of advantage with them. 

Parents need to understand what happens in education. In the classroom, in the school, in the district, and in the state, the key measures are about the 50% left behind, not the few doing well. Those doing well have numerous advantages and will likely do well without investments in child development, early education, or catch up programming. For most American children, these recovery investments are essential. When the designers decide that cuts on costs are the only dictate, the powerful parents will direct the remaining funds to their children.

Most Americans will lose in this process of squeezes within squeezes, leaving an entire nation further behind.


Worsening disparities will continue to make matters worse

 What we understand about social determinants indicates that declines in income, education, and other determinants will shape worsening health outcomes. Cash flow into an area can aid in development and recovery. Cash flow restrictions or requirements to send cash outside of an area can result in social determinant changes such as declines in jobs, income, and other areas. Rural and single county hospital closures are an example of such declines. An acceleration of closures of practices and hospitals where needed is the small scale example. State and national changes indicate massive changes in cash flow.
  • Federal and state funding cuts in child development, education, nutrition, Social Security, and health care where needed will worsen cash flow, jobs, economic impact, and situations where disparities exist as these are areas even more dependent upon these investments. 
  • Downsizing business changes, centralization of government positions (social services, extension), mergers of businesses and health care, and consolidations of schools all represent compromises of cash flow, jobs, income, 
  • Largest urban and rural systems take over those smaller. Some even proceed despite violations of the law. Local health care needs and local cash flow are compromised while centralized location benefit.
  • Mail order prescriptions took billions away from local pharmacies and economics while centralizing spending in just a few US locations. 
  • Requirements for health care providers to spend more for consultants, software, and other "advances" will send more dollars out of counties in need of spending. Practices will not be able to support local workforce as delivery personnel must decline to pay more for non-delivery budget items.

Unicef Report Card 11
Recent Works

Starting to Solve Societal Inequities - Support for a SMART Start from the Very Beginning of Life

Best Beginnings for Health Access Clinicians - Shared Origins and Optimal Health Access Focus During Trainings

Family Medicine Needs a New Beginning - Current Preparation, Admission, and Medical School Plus Health Policy Interact To Prevent Family Medicine Choice - and Health Access Result

Too Many and the Wrong Clinicians for graphic - Additional consequences result from designs not specific to primary care or care where needed.   

And the Next Victims of Cost Cutting: Dual Eligibles - Those Most Vulnerable and Least Able to Defend Themselves Are Next

ALS Disease Focus Is Not a Top Priority - Have fun, but Minor Incidence Diseases Are Below the Major Diseases, and Far Below Health Care Caused Disease, and Causes of Early Death, and the top 10 priorities for most Americans - and America as a Nation  

Hotspotting Has Many Spots To Consider - Simple Interpretations Are Inaccurate, Many Different Characteristics Shape the Outcomes, Not Just Geographic Location

Retail Clinic Recoil - Many Side Effects Can Be Anticipated, And More to Come

Global Fails Local But Local Focus Succeeds Globally

What Veterans Need Is Family Practice - No Other Type of Clinician Comes Close to the Location or the Scope

Domino Decline By Design - as ERs Close, Those Nearby Face Challenges, as Small or Rural Hospitals Close or Practices Where Needed...

Declines in Health Care Delivery Despite Increases in Health Spending - If We Keep Accelerating Non-Delivery Costs, We Can Continue to Remain Behind Health Care Demand

Health Care Delivery Is No Laughing Matter - Political Cartoons are Nice, but...



Blogs indicate that primary care can be recovered and should be recovered.

Dr. Bowman is the North American Co-Editor of Rural and Remote Health. He was the founding chair of the Rural Medical Educators Group of the National Rural Health Association and the long term chair of the STFM Group on Rural Health.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Fine CMS You Have Gotten Us Into

Perhaps we are indeed back to the time of Another Fine Mess (Laurel and Hardy). In a mad rush to implement innovation and to save all possible costs, CMS is creating complications for people that it is most responsible to protect. As PBS and Ken Burns celebrate the legacy of The Roosevelts, it is tragic to see what has become of over a century of effort involving Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and health care equity. The United States has one of the most complex health designs and clearly the various designers often know not what they are doing to others. More cartoons and comedians would find this a ripe area for material if not for the suffering involved. Health and Human Services has a huge role across Social Security and US health care. CMS or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has a dominant role to play in the design of health care in the United States.  CMS can be progressive or regressive. Interestingly CMS has chosen to appear to be progressive and in
Read more

The Essential True Reform Restores Primary Care and Much More

The list of distractions from True Reform are impressive. For decades True Reform has been specifically avoided as primary care worsens within practices and from outside. The demise is most specifically about the financial design. Unless there is a focus on True Reform, there is little hope for Basic Health Access. This may not make as much sense to those outside of family medicine. Family physicians not familiar with AAFP may also be clueless. If you think that you can fix primary care with more technology, more rearrangements, more types of health professional graduates, or more expansions of training - think again. None of these have any hope of working without financial design changes - major changes. The following are various concepts that dominate the discussions at AAFP and primary care meetings and media releases of associations and foundations and institutions. Members, staff, media releases, programs, and personnel have been reviewed.  There is little about Tru
Read more

Innovation Is the Problem Not the Solution for Worsening Health

Image
Innovation is good. Innovation worship is not good. Innovation application without scientific testing or clinical trials is unethical regarding clinical interventions and should be just as prohibited with regard to health policy. Clinical trials can harm hundreds or thousands. Innovative policies can harm millions. It takes a reasonable understanding of health care, health care outcomes, social determinants, and the investments that most improve social determinants to understand the consequences arising from the innovative nightmares past, present, and future. If you review the information sources with a critical eye, you too may find that the innovative policy designs have been disruptive to care, have hurt health care where health care is most needed, have reduced access to care, and have resulted in distortions in the literature. Indeed what is accepted and published in journals seriously lacks consideration of alternative hypothesis, lacks inclusion of many pages of limitatio
Read more